VNC Administrative Committee Meeting Agenda
Administrative Committee Meeting Agenda
Extra Space Storage, Presidents Row Room
658 South Venice Blvd, Venice, 90291
Monday, September 13, 2010 at 7:00 PM
Note: (i) The Administrative Committee does not address or consider the merits of proposed agenda items. Its function is to determine whether a proposed agenda item will be placed on the next Board meeting agenda, postponed, referred to a specific committee for review and recommendation, treated as an announcement, or considered and resolved as a non-Board administrative matter. (ii) The Administrative Committee has the discretion to reorder consideration of matters on the agenda to accommodate stakeholders or for other reasons. (iii) Unless otherwise noted, the President abstains on all votes.
1. Call to Order and Roll Call
2. Approval of the Administrative Committee Agenda
3. Approval of outstanding Administrative Committee minutes submitted by the Secretary
August 09, 2010 Administrative Committee Meeting Minutes
(see http://venicenc.org/files/100809VNCAdComMinutes.doc)
4. Announcements & Public Comment on items not on the Agenda [10 min, no more than 2 minutes per person – no Ad Com member announcements permitted]
5. Old Administrative Committee Business
A Speaker Card & Agenda Request Drafts; (Hugh Harrison, treasurer@venicenc.org)
Discuss new speaker cards used at last board meeting (08/17/2010), and possible ways to improve or clarify.
B Create ‘Compliance Review & Conditions Follow Up’ Ad Hoc Committee
Challis Macpherson (challis.macpherson@Verizon.net)
MOTION: To approve the creation of a Compliance Review and Conditions Follow Up Ad Hoc Committee. This Committee will terminate after one year or at the request of VNC President.
MISSION STATEMENT: To research, record and track those projects and/or issues of which the Venice Neighborhood Council’s Board of Officers has taken a position or placed conditions on prior to approval.
Reports and/or updates from this Committee shall be compiled and submitted to the Board at least on a monthly basis, including dates and times of upcoming governmental reviews. The Committee shall also track and report on any subsequent actions taken by an applicant and/or governmental entities. The committee may render an opinion on an item but any conflicts-of-interest or ex partie communications by any of the members must be disclosed.
Since enforcement of non-compliance rests solely with the VNC Board, this committee will not make, or take, any action directly to any applicant or governmental body or entity without written permission from the VNC President. In pursuing its mission, the Committee must represent the positions as expressed by a majority vote of the VNC Board.
C Outreach Mailing List; Marc Saltzberg on behalf of the Outreach Committee (310-892-9660, outreach@venicenc.org)
The Outreach Committee passed the following motion: The backlog of data entry for VNC mailing list, including two elections, the BBQ, and the accumulated lists for the last 8 months be entered into our stakeholder database not later than October 1, 2010.
D Agenda Posting Places Marc Saltzberg on behalf of the Outreach Committee (310-892-9660, outreach@venicenc.org)
The Outreach Committee was asked to explore and recommend posting sites in order to comply with the new BONC / DONE directive that each NC have at least 5 official posting places in addition to their website. The Outreach Committee discussed suggestions made by the Neighborhood Committee, the Outreach Committee and recommended the following 8 sites and suggests that the Administrative Committee select the final five sites.
The criteria used to select posting places were:
• The site must be physically within the VNC boundaries (eg. the south side of Washington on County land is out).
• We have to have physical access to the site so that we can post.
• As many as possible (at least 1) should be available for viewing 24/7 (none currently are)
• The sites should be geographically diverse. There should be a reasonable level of foot traffic.
• the posting place must have a bulletin Board large enough to hold meeting notices from at least 3 committees simultaneously,
• posting at the site must not present an undue burden on person posting.
The committee recommends the following posting sites to adcom for final selection by that committee:
1. Penmar Park
2. Cow’s End (note: no bulletin board – windows available)
3. Café Collage (note: no bulletin board – windows available)
4. Whole Foods
5. **Groundworks Coffee – on Rose (note: no bulletin board – door available)
6. **Abbot’s Habit
7. **Oakwood Park
8. **Venice Library
- this is an existing posting site
The Committee recommends that the final list of public posting sites be noted on our website and in our literature
The Committee further recommends that Committee Chairs forward all agendas to the VNC Board and the VNC Neighborhood Committees for posting in front of their residences or on bulletin boards in their area.
6. New Administrative Committee Business A Administrative Issues
(II) Request for Public Records of the 2010 VNC Board Retreat; Joe Murphy (310-305-1444, secretary@venicenc.org)
I. As Secretary, to enable me to full my responsibility to prepare and publish the minutes of the 2010 VNC Board Retreat, I am requesting all related public records including, but not limited to: (a) The sheets upon which Board Members wrote their ideas and suggestions which were then used during the discussion that occurred near the end of the retreat (not the photographs taken by a stakeholder before the sheets were gathered for the discussion – I already have the photographs); and (ii) Recordings of all or parts of the meeting, or information that would enable me to request duplicates of any such recordings if not prepared by or at the request of the Board; (iii) Any other public records relating to the 2010 VNC Board Retreat that are not covered by the above.
II. As a Venice Stakeholder, I request copies of all of the above public records under the California Public Records Act.
Standing Rule 20 – VNC Vision Goals, states in part: “…these goals are designed to promote a more proactive, collaborative vision for VNC Committees to include in their deliberations as they formulate recommendations for Board consideration. The intent is to create a working framework of integrated strategies capable of achieving, over time, broader consensus and increased:
Participation: Consider strategies that encourage & facilitate broader involvement of stakeholders, major organizations, community groups, and government institutions, etc.“
As Secretary, I am required to prepare accurate minutes of all Board meetings and I do not yet have the public records or related information that would enable me to fulfill this obligation. As a Venice stakeholder, a request for public records under the Public Records Act does not require disclosure of an explanation for making the request. I believe that responsiveness to both of the above requests enhance the above extracted portion of the VNC Vision Goals.
(IV) Special Meeting to finalize Board Priorities 2010-11; Linda Lucks (310- 505-4220, President@venicenc.org)
At the VNC board retreat in July, the board identified a number of important areas of interest . A special meeting needs to be scheduled to a to finalize the priorities identified by board members so that the agenda for the year is clear.
I move that a special meeting be scheduled on a day other than a regular board meeting, or scheduled before/after the September board meeting.
(VII) Introducing from Underground Entertainment Use city channel; Yolanda Gonzalez (310 902-8690, fristmateyo@yahoo.com)
I would like to see if we can have our NC’s meetings televised on the city channel sharing costs with other NC“s which in my opinion is best outreach to the community. Underground Entertainment will introduce a possibility of how this project can be projected and introduced.
It will need funding, for projection and can bring in new students studying communications, in film and television as stakeholders. The funding can be combined with other NC’s who would like this idea, since it will be televised through the city channel.
Discuss the idea, and if possible sent it to the Outreach Committee, to organize it better.
This is the most inexpensive way of outreach to the stakeholders.
(VIII) Motion For Board Policy Requiring Transparency Re: Board Agendas & President Communications with Gov’t Personnel (for discussion only); Joe Murphy (310-305-1444; joedmurphy@ca.rr.com) See AD COM Exhibit A
Request Board enhance VNC credibility by institutionalizing transparency modeled on LA City Council Practice by adopting the following.
(IX) Notice to Community Improvement Project Recipients; (Hugh Harrison on behalf of the Budget Committee, treasurer@venicenc.org)
President to notify all recipients for community improvement funds that due to City funding difficulties, all payment requests should be submitted no later than May 15, 2011.
B Consideration of DRAFT September 21, 2010 Board Agenda
7. Announcements & Public Comment on items not on the Agenda
[10 min, no more than 2 minutes per person – no Ad Com member announcements permitted]
8. Adjourn
AD COM EXHIBIT A – Motion For Board Policy Requiring Transparency Re: Board Agendas & President Communications with Gov’t Personnel
Request Board enhance VNC credibility by institutionalizing transparency modeled on LA City Council Practice by adopting the following:
The VNC Board hereby declares its intent to enhance VNC credibility by institutionalizing transparency modeled on LA City Council Practice (e.g., see http://cityclerk.lacity.org/lacityclerkconnect/index.cfm?fa=ccfi.viewrec…, Council File: 09-3036, regarding the Oversize Vehicle Parking Restrictions Ordinance, and the public records posted there) and hereby:
A. Establishes, as VNC policy, that maximum reasonable transparency shall be provided to stakeholders in all VNC matters where such transparency is necessary to expand the credibility of the VNC by demonstrating the openness of its procedures and communications including, but not limited to:
(i) All stages of the preparation of Administrative Committee and Board agendas and minutes; and
(ii) All communications by the President with all government personnel.
B. Implements this policy by delegating to the Administrative Committee and the Communications Officer the task of preparing and presenting to the Board a Standing Rule or Standing Rules realistically capable of accomplishing this intent.
C. Mandates that, at a minimum, the Standing Rules which are presented to the Board shall:
(i) Require that Agenda Requests include, at a minimum, the information requested in the current Agenda Request process as reflected on the Administrative Committee webpage (http://www.venicenc.org/Adcom) and in its linked Agenda Request Forms.
(ii) Include automatic forwarding of AdCom Agenda Requests, and of Administrative Committee & Board Agendas/Minutes, to stakeholders requesting these public records.
(iii) Require use of part of the President’s monthly report time for the President: (a) to disclose the nature of any communications with gov’t personnel, and to respond to questions from stakeholders or board members related thereto; and (b) to respond to questions submitted in advance whether or not related to such communications.
D. Advises the Administrative Committee to consider the elements in the following Proposed Framework in its deliberations:
(i) Preparation of AdCom/Board Agendas
• Content: See AdCom/Board Agenda Request Forms at http://www.venicenc.org/Adcom:
Online (http://www.venicenc.org/Agenda)
Document (http://www.venicenc.org//files/100718AgendaRequestForm.doc)
• Mechanics:
1. Web forwards ARs to Agenda-Prep-Appointees/Pres/VP/REQUESTORS*/AR-AUTHOR (to confirm delivery).
- REQUESTORS: Those who request receipt by email of all ARs and of all AdCom & Board Agendas/Minutes.
2. President’s Agenda-Prep-Appointee prepares Draft AdCom Agenda per SR 7A and emails it to President for review. Agenda-Prep-Appointee emails approved version, or original version if approved version not available before 7PM Thursday, to Board/LUPC/NHC/REQUESTORS/AR-AUTHORS.
3. Secretary or his appointee prepares Draft AdCom Minutes and emails it to Board/LUPC/NHC/REQUESTORS/ AR-AUTHORS.
4. AdCom’s Agenda-Prep-Appointee prepares Draft Board Agenda from Draft AdCom Minutes or from AdCom Agenda (if Draft AdCom Minutes not available) and emails it to AdCom for review. Agenda-Prep-Appointee emails approved version, or original version if approved version not available before 7PM Thursday, to Board/LUPC/NHC/REQUESTORS/AR-AUTHORS.
5. Secretary or his appointee prepares Draft Board Minutes and emails it to Board/LUPC/NHC/REQUESTORS/ AR-AUTHORS.
(ii) President’s Disclosure of Communications with Gov’t Personnel & Responses to Questions
• Content: The President’s Disclosure of Communications with gov’t personnel & responses to verbal questions related thereto, or to questions submitted in advance, should provide sufficient context and detail to insure listener understanding regarding past, current or possible future VNC business.
•
• Mechanics: Questions submitted in advance should be required to conform to the timeframe for submitting agenda requests and should be integrated with the agenda request procedure (by addition of a Question for President box on the Agenda Request Forms) and, subject to appropriate screening by AdCom, should be made similarly available to Board/LUPC/NHC/REQUESTORS/AR-AUTHORS.
Standing Rule 20 – VNC Vision Goals, states in part:
“…these goals are designed to promote a more proactive, collaborative vision for VNC Committees to include in their deliberations as they formulate recommendations for Board consideration. The intent is to create a working framework of integrated strategies capable of achieving, over time, broader consensus and increased:
Participation: Consider strategies that encourage & facilitate broader involvement of stakeholders, major organizations, community groups, and government institutions, etc.“
I believe that Board adoption of the proposed motion would enhance the cited VNC Vision Goal; I also believe it would enhance the level of trust and credibility of the VNC in the eyes of the broader Venice Community, and in the eyes of the Government agencies the VNC will be seeking to influence on behalf of the Venice Community it claims to represent.
Board of Officers Meeting DRAFT Agenda
Westminster Elementary School (Auditorium)
1010 Abbot Kinney Blvd, Venice, 90291
Tuesday, September 21, 2010 at 7:00 PM
BOARD MEETINGS: The Venice Neighborhood Council holds its regular meetings on the third Tuesday of the month and may also call any additional required special meetings in accordance with its Bylaws and the Brown Act. All are welcome to attend.
TRANSLATION Services: Si requiere servicios de traducción, favor de notificar a la oficina 3 días de trabajo (72 horas) antes del evento. Si necesita asistencia con esta notificación, por favor llame a nuestra oficina 213.473.5391.
POSTING: The agenda and non-exempt writings that are distributed to a majority or all of the board members in advance of regular and special meetings may be viewed at Groundworks Coffee (671 Rose Ave Venice, CA 90291), Abbots Habit (1401 Abbot Kinney Blvd. Venice, CA 90291), the Venice Library (501 South Venice Boulevard, Venice, CA 90291), Oakwood Recreation Center (767 California St. Venice, CA 90291), the VNC website (http://www.venicenc.org), or at the scheduled meeting. For a copy of any record related to an item on the agenda, please contact the VNC secretary at secretary@venicenc.org.
PUBLIC COMMENT: The public is requested to fill out a “Speaker Card” to address the Board on any Old or New Business item on the agenda and the Treasurer’s Report. Comments from the public on these agenda items will be heard only when that item is being considered. Comments from the public on other agenda matters or on matters not appearing on the agenda but within the Board’s subject matter jurisdiction will be heard during the Public Comment period. Public comment is limited to two (2) minutes per speaker, unless modified by the presiding officer of the Board.
DISABILITY POLICY: The Venice Neighborhood Council complies with Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act and does not discriminate on the basis of any disability. Upon request, the Venice Neighborhood Council will provide reasonable accommodations to ensure equal access to its programs, services, and activities. Sign language interpreters, assistive listening devices, or other auxiliary aids and/or services may be provided upon request.
1. Call to Order & Roll Call Meeting called to order in memory of Carol Hector, Publisher of The Argonaut
2. Approval of the Agenda
3. Approval of outstanding minutes (1 minute)
August 17, 2010 Board Meeting Minutes
(see http://venicenc.org/files/100817VNCBoardMinutes.doc)
4. Announcements & Public Comment on items not on the Agenda
[10 min, no more than 2 minutes per person – no board member announcements permitted] ,
5. Treasurers Report; Hugh Harrison (10 min) See Exhibit A
Attached is the report on expenditures for August 2010. Also attached is a copy of the monthly purchase card billing for the VNC with notations as to the purpose for each expenditure.
6. Old Business
[Discussion and possible action regarding the following matters]
A Café Windward at 22-28 Windward (ZA 2010-510 PAB SPP CUB); Jake Kaufman, LUPC Chair on behalf of LUPC (310-463-0299; Chair-LUPC@VeniceNC.org) See Exhibit B
Motion to recommend the project as presented noting, an increase in hours of
M-W 11:30a-11:30p,
Thrs-Sat 930a-2am and
Sunday 9:30a-12am
An increase in seating from 70-84,
That the project meet BMP,
And no exemptions or variances for parking.
Approved (7-0-0)
Date of Motion: July 14, 2010
[Jake will provide staff report and supporting documentation by Monday.]
B Request Funding for event as promised by VNC; Alex Stowell (metal.beach@hotmail.com)
I am seeking funding for an all ages metal show at Muscle Beach to take place on Oct. 30 and 31. I was promised $2000 for this through the VNC neighborhood improvement funding and this commitment was reneged upon. I had followed all the required steps and was never contacted by Ivan Speigel informing me that the funding could be in trouble. After several failed attempts to contact him regarding the proper process for submitting receipts, I was informed rather casually, that my funding was no longer available. I put my name on this event over a year ago and have over 100 people involved in performance and production. I have already postponed it once. The total cost for the event is going to be around $4000 and I would greatly appreciate any funding you could take out of this year’s allotment and apply to my event. Thank you very much for time and consideration. This event will give young Venice musicians a great chance to showcase their skills.
7. New Business
[Discussion and possible action regarding the following matters]
A Sponsorship of Halloween Carnival; Lizka Mendoza on behalf of Oakwood Recreation Center- City of LA (310-452-7479, Lizka.Mendoza@lacity.org)
Oakwood RC would like VNC to sponsor our Halloween Carnival to be held on Saturday, October 31, 2010 at Penmar RC. Due to budget limitations, the Department of Rec & Parks had mandated that Mar Vista RC, Penmar RC and Oakwood RC host one Halloween event at one park site. If possible, we would like VNC to assist us in the promotion of this FREE event to ensure that proper advertisement is done throughout the entire Venice and Penmar community.
B First Friday’s VNC Booth; Marc Saltzberg on behalf of the Outreach Committee (310-892-9660, outreach@venicenc.org)
The VNC First Friday’s Table no longer has a coordinator and no one from the Outrreach Committee has stepped forward to take it on. If the board desires the table to be continued it should find an individual who will coordinate volunteers, selection of and maintaining a venue, and delivery / pick-up of set-up materials.
C 585 Venice Blvd; Jake Kaufman, LUPC Chair on behalf of LUPC (310-463-0299; Chair LUPC@VeniceNC.org) See Exhibit C
Jim Murez provided synopsis of his report and the public hearing, John Reed presented the project as reported in the documentation.
The request is to support a “change of use” to Retail Use from Manufacturing.
Comments from Ron Lasker and Sam Kagen, building co-owners in the property since 1989.
Motion made by Jim Murez and seconded by Robert Aronson to approve the project as presented for:
i. Change of Use form Mfg to Retail
ii. Change of Use from Mfg to Storage
iii. Add 5 parking spaces
iv. Grant the City easement rights to provide the 26’ width requirement to provide 30 degree public parking in the public right of way along Venice Blvd.
[Jake will provide staff report and supporting documentation by Monday.]
D 533 Rose (Biga); Jake Kaufman, LUPC Chair on behalf of LUPC (310-463-0299; Chair LUPC@VeniceNC.org) See Exhibit D
Motion made by Susan Papadakis and seconded by Robert Aronson to approve the project as presented noting:
i. Bike rack,
ii. That the project meet BMP,
iii. Hours of 9AM-11PM weekdays and 9AM- 12 midnight on Friday and Saturday.
iv. No deliveries before 8:30 AM on weekdays or 10AM on weekends.
Approved (6-0-0) John Reed recused. Date of Motion: July 14, 2010
[Jake will provide staff report and supporting documentation by Monday.]
8. Scheduled Announcements (no more than 1 minute per report unless otherwise stated)
A VNC Announcements (3 min)
• President: Linda Lucks (310-505-4220; president@venicenc.org)
• Vice President: Carolyn Rios (310-821-7922; VP@venicenc.org)
[Summary of Written Committee Reports when provided in advance]
• Neighborhood; Carolyn Rios
• Outreach; Marc Salzberg
• OFW; Ivonne Guzman, Ira Koslow
• Arts; Clark McCutcheon, Daffodyl Timinski
• Education; Peter Thottam
• Environment; Kristopher Valentine
• Public Safety; Nick Hippisley Coxe
• Community Improvement Projects: Ivan Spiegel (310-821-9556; ivan13147@verizon.net)
B Governmental Reports (15 min)
• State Assemblyperson Ted Lieu; Jennifer Zivkovic, Field Representative (310-615-3515; Jennifer.zivkovic@asm.ca.gov)
• Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa; Jennifer Badger, West Area Representatives (310-479-3823; jennifer.badger@lacity.org)
• City Councilperson Bill Rosendahl: Arturo Piña, Field Deputy (310-568-8772; arturo.pina@lacity.org)
• LAPD: Officer Peggy Thusing, Senior Lead Officer (310-622-3968; 25120@lapd.lacity.org)
• Western Regional Alliance of Councils: Mike Newhouse (310-795-3768; mnewhouse@newhouseseroussi.com)
• PlancheckLA: VNC Rep Challis Macpherson (310-822-1729; Challis.Macpherson@Verizon.net)
• LA Dept of Water & Power/Memoranda of Understanding: VNC Rep DeDe Audet (310-251-1054; daudet@ca.rr.com)
9. Announcements & Public Comment on items not on the Agenda [10 min, no more than 2 minutes per person – no board member announcements permitted]
10. Old Business
[Discussion and possible action regarding the following matters]
A Abbot Kinney Parking Report, Recommendations and Community Impact Statement; Jed Pauker, Robin Rudisill (310.827.0144; gojednet-parkingAbK@yahoo.com): See Exhibit E
Abbot Kinney’s parking issues are unique to its surroundings. This report is intended to acknowledge and promote Abbot Kinney’s eclectic and independent character with practical recommendations to address Abbot Kinney’s valet parking and food truck issues.
MOTION: We move that the Venice Neighborhood Council Board of Officers accept the foregoing report and approve the following recommendations and Community Impact Statement, for immediate transmittal to Council District 11 Office and the City Council and LA County Supervisor Yaroslavsky:
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1) Promote a consolidated valet parking program for the Abbot Kinney area.
2) Promote continued communications among involved entities to produce mutually-beneficial initiatives,
3) Promote consideration of a parking study to address current and future needs for Abbot Kinney and its surrounding area.
4) Support implementing a Business Improvement District to develop community-serving business activity management policies.
5) Support County Health Department consideration to provide cleanliness letter grading for mobile catering trucks.
6) Where a private location is used to host one or more food trucks, consider regulating the maximum number of simultaneous patrons onsite to protect public safety.
7) Where a private location is used to host one or more food trucks in or near a residential area, consider requiring signage near the property perimeter, in obvious, plain sight, advising patrons to consider residential neighbors and citing pertinent noise ordinances.
8) Where a public location is used to host a food truck, promote consideration of a permit process, part of whose fees contribute to the Venice Coastal Zone Parking Impact Fund
9) Promote inclusion of VNC’s recommendations with the City Council’s work to address food truck impacts.
VALET PARKING AND FOOD TRUCKS
COMMUNITY IMPACT STATEMENT
Venice Coastal Zone parking is at an ever-increasing premium for residents, businesses and visitors alike. Multiple short- and long-term parking restrictions continue to prove insufficient in achieving their collective goal to ease automotive congestion and the inevitable neighbor-to-neighbor tensions it creates. Lack of adequate enforcement of existing regulations combines with the failure of existing regulations to address our changing environment. Only with comprehensive and carefully-crafted initiatives designed to create space where none seems to exist can our community members and visitors hope to regain the full enjoyment of our uniquely diverse and walkable community which was intended by its founder.
Whereas our community’s first priority is the safety of our residents and visitors, Be it resolved that the VNC Board of Officers make the following recommendations: Request our CD11 representative by letter [Exhibit B, attached] to direct the City Attorney to present to the City Council forthwith an Ordinance per Council File 09-0206 (http://cityclerk.lacity.org/lacityclerkconnect/index.cfm?fa=ccfi.viewrec…), establishing a valet permit parking program in the City of Los Angeles.
B Request to approve CIS regarding mechanical parking lift issue; Jed Pauker (310.827.0144, jed@jed.net)
Mechanical parking lifts can benefit the community, but only when they are deployed per approved community planning guidelines. Approving such devices without public input and Planning Department review negatively impacts the community, the planning process, Coastal development and the principles of representative government. A moratorium should be placed on approval of mechanical parking lifts until an ordinance can be drafted to specify proper review and operational standards for such devices in the community.
11. New Business
[Discussion and possible action regarding the following matters]
A Need for increased Sanitation in Venice NOW; Cindy Chambers , Carolyn Rios on behalf of the VNC Neighborhood Committee (310-821-7922; crlynrios@ca.rr.com)
See Exhibit F
WHEREAS 16 million people visit Venice every year, they are confronted with inadequate sanitation facilities. It is a daily health and safety problem for visitors and residents alike who suffer as beach visitors leave the area, not willing to wait in lines to use the public bathroom facilities. These lines are often 25 people deep on weekends, and
WHEREAS both the County and City of Los Angeles must acknowledge the urgency of the situation and immediately increase the availability of sanitation services to the Venice area
BE IT RESOLVED that the Venice Neighborhood Council, being aware that this situation has reached critical mass, requests the following actions:
1- Public bathrooms need extended hours with heightened maintenance and security. Additional portable toilets should be placed both on beach parking lots and away from the beach.
2- Since RV dwellers all over Los Angeles need to empty their sanitation tanks, we urge the City and County to provide free coupons to the Dockweiler or other sanitation facilities for people who cannot afford them.
3- The City and/or the County should provide regular pickups by mobile sump trucks to each region of the City and County to immediately service a growing population due to the poor economic situation.
Preventing sanitation problems is more cost efficient than clean-up costs (Hazmat).
[This is a place holder motion. Need is ASAP, but the Neighborhood Committee is first meeting Monday, 9/13/10 due to Labor Day]
B Median Strip & foliage for Washington Blvd; Carolyn Rios: The Neighborhood Committee recommends that the VNC make the following motion in support of Statkeholder John Tabis. (818-560-6107, jtabis1@yahoo.com)
See Exhibit G
Whereas Washington Blvd is already torn up for sewage work, it is imperative that the final asphalting plan be changed to include a curb and gutter median strip so that this part of the street ( Mildred St to Palawan Way) can be beautified with trees and foliage.
[This is a place holder for a motion which should be approved at the NHC meeting Monday morning 9/13/10]
C Friends of Ballona Wetlands Organization Update; David Kay on behalf of the Friends of Ballona Wetlands (626-302-2149, david.kay@sce.com)
Friends of Ballona Wetlands will update the Council on organization status, and positions on the State’s wetlands access proposals
D Letter to City of Los Angeles Planning Department regarding Negative Declaration-NG=10-280-PL; ENV 2010-715 General Framework Element; Challis Macpherson
Dear Madam/Sir:
Please extend the time period for public comment on this case for six (6) months to enable the neighborhood councils to respond.
That the Venice Neighborhood Council endorses the resolution to require the Planning Department to:
1. Post all background research documents related to NEGATIVE DECLARATION-NG=10-280-PL: ENV 2010-715 online.
2. To provide full disclosure of the precise text of these proposed changes and how they fit into the General Plan Framework Element.
3. To restart the Negative Declaration process at the time these documents are posted to provide for full review of the Guidelines and the Negative Declaration in accordance with CEQA notification and review requirements.
E Rate Payers Advocate; DeDe Audet (daudet@ca.rr.com) See Exhibit H
I move that the VNC board send a letter to Councilman Rosendahl concerning the selection, duties, reach, and term of a Ratepayers Advocate to monitor the actions of the Los Angeles Department of Water Power in relation to the fees charged for delivery of water and power to the citizens of Los Angeles.
12. Announcements & Public Comment on items not on the Agenda [10 min, no more than 2 minutes per person – no board member announcements permitted]
13. Board Member Comments on subject matters within the VNC jurisdiction. [10 min, no more than 1 minutes per person]
14. Adjourn (approx 10:00PM)
Exhibit A – Treasurers Report
Exhibit B – LUPC Staff Report regarding Café Windward at 22-28 Windward Exhibit C – LUPC Staff Report regarding 585 Venice Blvd Exhibit D – LUPC Staff Report 533 Rose (Biga) Exhibit E – Abbot Kinney Parking Report, Recommendations and Community Impact StatementIn pursuing our assignment to investigate, report and recommend on the issues of food trucks and valet parking, we focused on the following questions:
o Do our recommendations enhance the mission of the VNC?
o To what extent, and for how many stakeholders, can our work improve the quality of life?
o What City resources are likely to be readily available, and for what resources may we have to petition?
o What VNC resources, both technical and human, does our work require?
o How much public meeting time is our presentation likely to require?
o How soon must the Board act in order to move forward most effectively?
Our Neighborhood Council is, first and foremost, the messenger of our community’s voice to the City. Recommendations on these issues are designed to speak as broadly and directly as possible for the benefit of all Venice stakeholders, whether homeowner, renter, entrepreneur or visitor. We must speak to the City mindful of its current financial destitution, as well as its mandate, in any case, to represent our community’s will. Understanding that this is a time of transition to a new VNC Board, we planned our work to use the least possible personnel resources while making the best use of available technical tools. We expect to require no more than twenty minutes of Board meeting time to present our findings and recommendations, and for Board consideration. Because these issues are as rapidly-moving as are their proponents and regulators, promising benefits that far outweigh current detriments, we recommend that the Board act with all due haste.
To date, our work has included: Research on recent local food truck and valet parking history; outreach to CD11 and CD4 staff, LAPD, the Fire Marshall, LADOT, local food truck vendors and their representative, local residents and entrepreneurs for direction, information and general issue discussion; research on the food truck industry’s nationwide emergence; analysis of valet parking issues and existing models; and, finally, First Friday field work on Abbot Kinney Boulevard.
RESOURCES
Online
Research materials are posted here: http://venicenc.org/parking-abbotkinney.
Survey
The community continues to provide survey input. Designed as a door-to-door poll of the area immediately encircling the most-impacted Abbot Kinney area, our VNC survey also received input via email from as far away as the Milwood walk streets, and at least one response to date arriving via US mail. The strict quantification of replies to “Yes/No/Don’t-Care” questions regarding food trucks and valet parking belies the remarkably holistic range of thoughtful comments, questions and suggestions provided by stakeholders from both the residential and business communities.
This said, the nominal numbers follow:
Food Truck Operations
31% Positive – I welcome them.
54% Negative – I want them gone.
15% Neutral – They don’t affect me.
Valet Parking
5% Positive – I welcome them.
52% Negative – I want them gone.
43% Neutral – They don’t affect me.
Survey considerations and highlights:
While at least one respondent reported an altercation with a valet parking worker, some others reported no awareness that valets parked cars on their streets. Still others reported frustration with valets parking on their streets, while one expressed no concern about parking congestion, offering her family’s acceptance of scarce parking as a de facto condition of moving into the area. More than one resident expressed a sense of unfairness about grandfather parking rights for restaurants at their expense.
Whereas the VNC survey pertained to both food truck and valet parking issues, the Abbot Kinney business survey, generously compiled and provided in the aggregate by Carol Tantau, pertained strictly to Abbot Kinney food truck operations and, for the most part, their First Fridays experiences. As such, valet parking opinions were not available from Abbot Kinney businesses. While the vast majority of Abbot Kinney business operators were critical of the presence and some practices of food truck operators, many comments showed both tolerance and business benefits from food truck operations on Abbot Kinney.
Note: Survey answers were provided per the promise of anonymity for respondents. Some stakeholders chose to receive further information about these issues, and some signed up to receive regular VNC mailings.
While the surveys show respondents’ opinions, they do not address resolving our fundamental challenge: automotive congestion.
Studies
In addition to the variety of nationally-based online resources developed since May, we received a report from a local group that had commissioned a 2009 parking study for Lincoln Boulevard. Two graduate students from UCLA’s Department of Urban Planning, under Professor Donald Shoup, studied parking along Lincoln Boulevard between Machado Drive and Venice Boulevard. The study’s recommendations were “intended to foster a less auto-dependent and more pedestrian-, bike-, and transit-friendly Lincoln Boulevard.” The study included summaries of results in other cities that have realized benefits from parking congestion-relieving initiatives, some of which would merit consideration for Abbot Kinney.
On August 11, the City Council Transportation Committee, led by Councilmember Rosendahl, held a public hearing, at which a multitude of City, County, restaurant and mobile food truck operators and representatives convened, to share analysis, reports and wide-ranging testimony on the history, growth and subsequent management challenges for the City’s mobile catering truck industry. A wealth of valuable data, including examples of traditional business groups working with mobile food truck vendors, was made available to the public at this meeting.
Outreach
Our outreach and research efforts dovetailed with stakeholder survey input to inform our recommendations. Senior Lead Officers Thusing and Skinner were always willing to answer our questions about codes and practical enforcement challenges, also arranging for a police helicopter to estimate the crowd size on September 3 (approximately two thousand). LAFD Inspector Nealy provided deep perspective based on his safety and crowd assessment work. Council District 11 Office staff Arturo Pina, Laura McClennan and John Gregory each provided direction and contact information for various entities. DOT’s Mo Blorfroshan provided helpful direction regarding signage. Finally, our own Past-President Emeritus DeDe Audet and Liz Wright provided direction, as well as offers to help with orange safety vests for our work!
More than one survey respondent mentioned self-regulation. Discussions with representatives of Abbot Kinney vendors and food truck operators have produced ideas and initiatives, at least one of which is active now and more of which are in the planning stages. These initiatives include, but are not limited to, exploring new parking options, increasing frequency and scope of trash collection, direct outreach to Abbot Kinney businesses, relocating food trucks to low-impact areas, designating specific areas for multiple trucks and partnering between food truck and business operators to provide incentives to residents.
Given that some new regulation is likely inevitable, our efforts must focus on continuing positive dialogue and transparently-vetted goals.
September 22, 2010
Councilman Bill Rosendahl
City Hall
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Dear Bill,
The Venice Neighborhood Council passed a resolution at its meeting on September 21, 2010, approving a report and recommendations regarding valet parking and food truck impact issues in and around Abbot Kinney Boulevard.
As you know, Los Angeles lacks a centralized valet parking program, leading to valet practices that include cordoning off zones which may not belong to their clients and negatively affecting already-congested residential parking areas in Venice’s Coastal Zone. In contrast, many adjacent and nearby cities enjoy regulated valet parking services, with predictable and enforceable operating rules and permit requirements.
We understand that the City Attorney has been directed to prepare an ordinance to establish a citywide valet parking permit program.
As we all know, the dynamic and exciting explosion of the mobile food vendor industry also brings unexpected and unwelcome impacts, which risk overshadowing this industry’s innovative and community-building effects on our social and economic landscape.
We applaud your Transportation Committee’s public dialogue on the issue. We believe Venice’s broad experience with both issues, both as to current impacts and emerging initiatives, is critically relevant, and will help you inform this dialogue for the benefit of all parties.
We therefore request your cooperation in bringing the Venice Neighborhood Council’s recommendations to this dialogue’s discussion table. We are prepared to provide the resources necessary to engage fellow participants for the purpose of providing the comprehensively-crafted solutions these issues deserve.
Thank you in advance for your expeditious response to your community and, as always, your good works.
Respectfully submitted,
Linda Lucks
President
Venice Neighborhood Council
cc: Councilman Bill Rosendahl
Exhibit F – Sanitation problems in Venice
COMMUNITY IMPACT STATEMENT TO BE ATTACHED TO COUNCIL FILE #:
To: Office of the City Clerk
Los Angeles City Hall
200 N. Spring St., Rm 360
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Re: Sanitation problems in Venice
Mayor Antonio Villaragosa
Councilman Bill Rosendahl
Bureau of Sanitation:
9/13/10
WHEREAS 16 million people visit Venice every year, they are confronted with inadequate sanitation facilities. It is a daily health and safety problem for visitors and residents alike who suffer as beach visitors leave the area, not willing to wait in lines to use the public bathroom facilities. These lines are often 25 people deep on weekends, and
WHEREAS both the County and City of Los Angeles must acknowledge the urgency of the situation and immediately increase the availability of sanitation services to the Venice area
BE IT RESOLVED that the Venice Neighborhood Council, being aware that this situation has reached critical mass, requests the following actions:
1- Public bathrooms need extended hours with heightened maintenance and security. Additional portable toilets should be placed both on beach parking lots and away from the beach.
2- Since RV dwellers all over Los Angeles need to empty their sanitation tanks, we urge the City and County to provide free coupons to the Dockweiler or other sanitation facilities for people who cannot afford them.
3- The City and/or the County should provide regular pickups by mobile sump trucks to each region of the City and County to immediately service a growing population due to the poor economic situation.
Preventing sanitation problems is more cost efficient than clean-up costs (Hazmat).
CC: patrice.lattimore@lacity.org; Secretary@VeniceNC.org
Exhibit G – Median Strip & foliage for Washington BlvdCOMMUNITY IMPACT STATEMENT TO BE ATTACHED TO COUNCIL FILE #:
To: Office of the City Clerk
To: Office of the City Clerk
Los Angeles City Hall
200 N. Spring St., Rm 360
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Re: Median Strip & foliage for Washington Blvd
Mayor Antonio Villaragosa
Councilman Bill Rosendahl
9/13/10
Whereas Washington Blvd is already torn up for sewage work, it is imperative that the final asphalting plan be changed to include a curb and gutter median strip so that this part of the street ( Mildred St to Palawan Way) can be beautified with trees and foliage. Install center dividers, preferably with some kind of foliage, to separate the two sides of the street starting West of Mildred and running along Washington until Palawan Way. This is a purely residential area, and yet the street is wide and unwieldy and not as attractive as it could be. By putting in a barrier we would reduce noise, and have a chance to beautify this stretch. Since the sewer construction has ripped up the center of the road anyway, this is the perfect time to make this change.
Please stop the final stage of asphalting on Washington Blvd, install the median strip as requested, and give us a chance to find the funding for the beautification of the median strip.
Exhibit H – Rate Payer AdvocateDraft September 20, 2010
Los Angeles City Councilmember Bill Rosendahl
800 N. Spring Street Rm. 415
Los Angeles, California
Dear Councilmember Rosendahl, At its meeting on September 20, 2010, the Venice Neighborhood Council endorsed the attached memorandum concerning the selection, duties, reach, and term of a Ratepayers Advocate to monitor the actions of the Los Angeles Department of Water Power in relation to the fees charged for delivery of water and power to the citizens of Los Angeles.
Please forward this communication and the attached document to the DWP Reform combined Rules and Elections and Energy and Environment committees of the City Council for consideration for a ballot measure to be prepared for the March 2011 Election.
Your interest in this issue and your hosting of a meeting in District 11 to receive input from stakeholders has been very helpful.
Thank you,
Linda Lucks President, Venice Neighborhood Council
CV/da
Attach: Ratepayers Preliminary Term Sheet
CC: R&E, E&E
Location(s)
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 100913AdComAgenda.doc | 2.65 MB |
- Calendar
- 1178 reads